I believe my write-up on Traudl Junge would be incomplete without mentioning one more fact. I wrote in my note that non-Jewish population in Germany during the early days of the War were oblivious to Holocaust. They were in fact living an increasingly comfortable life and for them Hitler had brought hope for the future and the belief that they could win the War. Of course, people like Hans Junge knew that something was wrong and one has to go beyond the shadows of Hitler in order to know the truth. But aside these individual cases, there were largely two separate groups of people who felt the real truth. One group was that of those who witnessed the bloodshed themselves, with their own eyes. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_assisted_Jews_during_the_Holocaust lists most of these well known persons and the reason for them being recognized as the “Righteous among the nations”. We have seen one such case in the movie Schindler’s List. There are plenty more. There was one another group that also came to realize the truth and what was really going on. This group, lead by a young University of Munich professor, called themselves as the White Rose ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rose). They distributed leaflets in the University … they could only distribute six of them during the period from June 1942 to February 1943. In one of these leaflets for example, the group writes:
Memoirs of Traudl Junge – Addendum
October 27, 2008Memoirs of Traudl Junge
October 22, 2008Memoirs of Traudl Junge – concluding part
October 20, 2008** These words were actually taken from Albert Speer’s memoirs which he wrote in jail while he was serving his sentence. To quote wikipedia: “In the published edition of Inside the Third Reich, Speer relates that he confessed to Hitler that he had defied the Nero Decree, but then assured Hitler of his personal loyalty, bringing tears to the dictator’s eyes”
Anil’s Ghost – Michael Ondaatje
September 20, 2008Over the time, I have developed a strong liking for non-fictions that explores the darker and complex realities of human societies. When the going gets tough, its easy to complain about how wretched we are, in our circumstances and surroundings. These writings help us to realize that it could always have been worse and that in reality how well we are within our circumstances! Ondaatje who is a Canadian writer of South Asian origin writes about these complex social circumstances. Anil’s Ghost is no different.
Unlike The English Patient which was completely based on fiction (except geographical facts like existence of the Cave of Swimmers and time/circumstances of its discovery), Anil’s Ghost is based on real life political incidents in Sri Lanka. It deals with the Sri Lankan civil war that is still in progress in the Island (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_Civil_War). Anil Tissera, a forensic scientist living and studying in United States/UK visits Sri Lanka, her former homeland to investigate the deaths of civilians in the War as a part of Human Rights Investigation by United Nations. In Lanka, she meets Sarath Diyasena, an archaeologist who helps her in her investigation. During the course of the novel, through numerous flash backs, the writer reveals the characters in depth and the details of their lives to his readers. We come to know about Anil’s failed marriage, her brief relationship with Cullis Wright, a married science writer in the US, Sarath’s view about the war and his confusing allegiance. We also meet Gamini, Sarath brother and learn about their past lives and the reason for their hostility between relations. We learn about Gamini’s deep affection for Sarath’s wife, her death and his wife’s leaving him. We encounter another character, Ananda, who is called upon on the suggestion of Palipana, Sarath’s guru, to help Anil/Sarath to reconstruct the face of a recently buried man’s skeleton. The skeleton is nick-named “The Sailor”, which they had found around an archaeological site. The entire novel revolves around these characters, the Sailor and the lives and feelings of these characters within the circumstances of the civil war and beyond.
But Anil’s Ghost is not entirely about the characters and their experiences. It is, in reality, just an outer clothing to explore the deeper and ugly circumstances of the Lankan civil war. Its about how the govt and the Tamil rebel group (though not named, its the LTTE, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTTE) tried to hide evidence of the killing and how the media was suppressed from reporting the death and the gore around the war. As the investigation goes on, Anil finally identifies the true name of the person behind the Sailor. Just then Sarath disappears along with Sailor! Some dramatic incidents happen towards the end of the novel that cast our suspicion over Sarath. However, we eventually we realize that Sarath was indeed helping Anil. He helps her to safely leave Sri Lanka, away from the eyes of the govt and the rebels. At the same time, he helps her in preserving the evidence – the evidence she had gathered from the Sailor and the skeleton itself along with her tape recorder that she had used to record all critical conversations. However, Sarath himself gets killed in the hands of the same people they were trying to uncover! A tragic yet thought provoking end. In reality, he continues to live within Anil and Gamini, in their memories, like a ghost – Anil’s Ghost.
Nearing the end of the novel, Ondaatje cleverly describes in detail the happenings related to one of the assassinations that kill President Katugala (a fictional name; in reality it represents President Ranasinghe Premadasa, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranasinghe_Premadasa). This is just one representative killing for thousands of other civilians, including the Indian leader of opposition and former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajiv_Gandhi). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notable_assassinations_of_the_Sri_Lankan_Civil_War describes other notable assassination victims.
The war still continues in Lanka and keeps taking its toll on innocent victims of war, every day, every moment of our lives …
The Maxine question in The Namesake
June 22, 2008So, lots of people have asked this question again and again “Why did Gogol and Maxine break up?”. Most people have vilified Maxine’s character and blamed her for it. As a matter of fact, it was quite opposite.
Here’s my answer that I posted to IMDB:
Unfortunately, most people just seeing the movie comes up with the same conclusion. However, it was entirely opposite. Maxine really loved him and I believe, as per the novel, out of the three women that Gogol got involved with, Maxine was probably the best.
Gogol always struggled with his Indian origin, his own identity and the cultural differences between how his parents were brought up and his American upbringing. He never identified himself with his own Indian parents and embraced a culture, which was so different from that of his parents’. His involvement with Maxine only reaffirmed it. With Maxine, he got well absorbed into their family. As a matter of fact, he started spending a lot of time with Gerald and Lydia (Maxine’s parents) completely brushing off his own parents. The Ratliffs, being unconventional, non-conservative, created an atmosphere where Gogol felt comfortable. During the summer, he went to spend time with them in the country side. IF you read the novel carefully, you would notice that he never gave their phone# to his parents.
In the novel, end of chapter 6, Lahiri aptly tells it all: “… that night, lying in the cabin beside Maxine, he is woken up by the sound of the phone ringing persistently in the main house. He gets out of bed, convinced that its his parents calling to wish him a happy birthday … realizes that the ringing he’s heard had been a dream. He returns to bed, squeezing in beside Maxine’s warm sleeping body and drapes his arm around her narrow waist … then he remembers that his parents can’t possibly reach him: he has not given them the number and the Ratliffs are unlisted. That here, at Maxine’s side, in this cloistered wilderness that he is free.”
When Gogol’s dad dies, for the first time, Gogol realized the barrier that had grown between him and his parents. He realized that he never really tried to understand Ashima or Ashoke. This neglect of his parents caused an intense feeling of guilt in him and mixed with intense trauma and pain of loosing his father, he started to identify Maxine as a cause of all this.
When Maxine meets Gogol at the funeral, she tries to comfort him in her best possible way. She believes that if Gogol could get away from the somber environment, it would make him feel happier. Some people have taken this as Maxine having a lack of feelings and not trying to understand Gogol (primarily because of her American upbringing). This is not true at all. Her thought causes her to propose their getaway plan during the coming Christmas. However, in his mind, Gogol knows that he has pushed himself away from his parents this long, long enough. It was time for him to come home. That’s why in the movie he says “I don’t want to go away”. He also realizes that Maxine probably would never understand him, his Indian half, the way his own parents did. In the novel, Gogol starts spending a lot of time with his mom in the days to come. This sudden change in Gogol’s attitude confuses Maxine as she does not quite realize the reason for this. She somewhat tolerates Gogol for a while. Eventually they begin to fight and Gogol calls off the relationship. A while later, Gogol meets Lydia accidentally and learns that Maxine has got engaged to another man.
Later, Ashima talks Gogol into starting a relationship with Moushumi. Moushumi, being a daughter of Indian Bengali parents and with American/European upbringing appeals to Gogol. But soon, Gogol realizes “perhaps its not enough that we (they) are both Bengalis”. Moushumi’s character is again a different story altogether.
Its unfortunate for both the characters here that this is how things turned up. I do believe that if Maxine could have done anything at this point, it would perhaps have been giving Gogol a little more space and time. Gogol should also have done better if he had explained the situation to her and be frank, the way she had always been. But that never happened. Thus is life anyway …
Some people have vilified Maxine’s character for wearing a black tank-top at Ashoke’s funeral while its Indian (Bengali) custom to wear white. Firstly, this scene never happens in the novel. Secondly, even in the movie, I don’t think anybody cared whether Maxine wore white or black. Customs vary and Maxine could not have known. It was important that she was there for him in his moment of grief and that she came and participated in the Indian funeral ritual. That’s the evidence of right attitude and Maxine had that in plenty.
Hope this helps.